#41
Posted 20 December 2011 - 09:36 PM
Win Vista/32
Installed over previous version. No problems and quick scan time is the same at just over 4 minutes.
Installed over previous version. No problems and quick scan time is the same at just over 4 minutes.
MBAM Paid edition
#42
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:50 PM
If it wasn't for Malwarebytes Antimalware I wouldn't have a stable PC no doubt about it. Since most AV's don't really catch Rogues (Fake AV)that run executable files that labels all exe files unusable and infect rather than do the correct command I'd stick with MBAM for life. 1.60.1400 works great as my quick scan took 3 mins and flash scan took about 40 sec for me @ least lol.
#43
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:57 PM
Install went smooth as butter!
nice new features!
nice new features!

9.11.01
'Never Forget'
Moderator-Beta Tester @
Outpost Users Support Forum
Microsoft® MVP Consumer Security-13
#44
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:57 PM
Can anyone tell me how to encode utf-16?
#45
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:05 PM
#46
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:21 PM
#47
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:50 PM
I just wanted to add how proud I am of our team, this release, and our diligent beta testers. I'm excited to get this shipped out to our users!
#48
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:57 PM
I just love testing.
#49
Posted 21 December 2011 - 02:03 AM
No errors upon installing and overwriting from previous stable version, using Windows 7 PRO SP1 x64 with MSE..
the only thing i noticed since update to beta 1.60 is my system is a bit slower a few seconds than before specially when opening explorer and browsing through my files. though not a big deal (i think 1-2secs. delay than before)
and also, it consumes more ram than previous.

note: I havent installing or change anything in my windows 7 since update to 1.60 beta
the only thing i noticed since update to beta 1.60 is my system is a bit slower a few seconds than before specially when opening explorer and browsing through my files. though not a big deal (i think 1-2secs. delay than before)
and also, it consumes more ram than previous.

note: I havent installing or change anything in my windows 7 since update to 1.60 beta
#50
Posted 21 December 2011 - 02:21 AM
Swandog46, on 20 December 2011 - 11:15 AM, said:
@nnoa110
We struggled a great deal with Japanese, more than with many other languages. Our GUI is written in VB, there are core VB display issues with certain languages, and Japanese is one of them. We may not be able to fix this. Re-encoding the language files in Unicode ensures the data itself is portable, i.e. that there is no ambiguity that the language file is intended to be Japanese, and no ambiguity about what *should be* displayed. The next step after that is to work out the issues with displaying the data itself, but unfortunately that is a separate problem.
Thanks for the information and It might be better to remove Japanese from MBAM since it does not work.
I will keep updating Japanese lng file in case you guys have found a solution in the future.
And one more thing, Do you plan to rewrite a GUI in the language other than VB?
#51
Posted 21 December 2011 - 10:03 AM
@Swarnava
Use Unicode in Notepad -- as I said, this is UTF-16.
@nnoa110
Thanks for understanding. We do intend to migrate away from VB in the future.
Use Unicode in Notepad -- as I said, this is UTF-16.
@nnoa110
Thanks for understanding. We do intend to migrate away from VB in the future.
#52
Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:00 PM
Installed over previous version and so far no problems. The only thing is that when I run updates it says I have the latest database (v2011.12.20.06) so no updates in almost 17 hours?
#53
Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:14 PM
yethz, on 21 December 2011 - 02:03 AM, said:
No errors upon installing and overwriting from previous stable version, using Windows 7 PRO SP1 x64 with MSE..
the only thing i noticed since update to beta 1.60 is my system is a bit slower a few seconds than before specially when opening explorer and browsing through my files. though not a big deal (i think 1-2secs. delay than before)
and also, it consumes more ram than previous.

note: I havent installing or change anything in my windows 7 since update to 1.60 beta
the only thing i noticed since update to beta 1.60 is my system is a bit slower a few seconds than before specially when opening explorer and browsing through my files. though not a big deal (i think 1-2secs. delay than before)
and also, it consumes more ram than previous.

note: I havent installing or change anything in my windows 7 since update to 1.60 beta
#54
Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:14 PM
G1111, on 21 December 2011 - 12:00 PM, said:
Installed over previous version and so far no problems. The only thing is that when I run updates it says I have the latest database (v2011.12.20.06) so no updates in almost 17 hours?

Dell Precision T7500, Win7 Ultimate 64bit fully updated, McAfee Corp Edition v8.8,
Watchguard Firewall, Intel Xeon E5606CPU, Dual Quad Core Processors, 16GB Ram,
E5606 @ 2.13GHz, Nvidia Quadro NVS420, Raid-1 Dual 1TB Sata 10000 rpm Hard Drives
Dual DVD Burners, IE10, Opera, MBAM
#55
Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:21 PM
Ditto, just installed and showing ....
Date: 20/12/2011 21:52:33
Database version: v2011.12.20.06
Fingerprints loaded: 350980
Date: 20/12/2011 21:52:33
Database version: v2011.12.20.06
Fingerprints loaded: 350980
#56
Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:21 PM
#57
Posted 21 December 2011 - 12:37 PM
Okay thanks.
#58
Posted 21 December 2011 - 02:18 PM
Is there a corporate version for beta testing? I've downloaded this one and am using the trial, but would like to get a test of the corporate version so I can get an idea of what it can do in our environment.
Thanks
Thanks
#59
Posted 21 December 2011 - 02:33 PM
Btw the time and date are not local. I believe it is gmt.
#60
Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:00 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked

Back to top











