70 replies to this topic

[goldhound]

Downloaded over previous, no problems, all settings were saved.

[siliconman01]

This is on Windows 7 SP1 x64 Professional with MBAM PRO Beta V1.62.0.1100

In Programs and Features, there are five(5) new uninstall entries labeled CVE-2012-1889. Are these from new MBAM? If so, why are there 5?

[siliconman01]

Scrub the above post. I found the answer to my own stupid question.

[ourstanley]

No hitch with installation, scan ran quicker than usual. Just one point noticed, after the last update (30 mins ago) the checkmark was missing from Website Blocking

Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (PRO) 1.62.0.1100
www.malwarebytes.org

Database version: v2012.06.29.04

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 x64 NTFS
Internet Explorer 9.0.8112.16421
ourstanley7d :: OURSTANLEY7D-PC [administrator]

Protection: Enabled

29/06/2012 08:27:06
mbam-log-2012-06-29 (08-27-06).txt

Scan type: Quick scan
Scan options enabled: Memory | Startup | Registry | File System | Heuristics/Extra | Heuristics/Shuriken | PUP | PUM
Scan options disabled: P2P
Objects scanned: 203983
Time elapsed: 2 minute(s), 47 second(s)

Memory Processes Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Memory Modules Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Registry Keys Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Registry Values Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Registry Data Items Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Folders Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Files Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

(end)

[ourstanley]

Yup, did the same as above with the latest update (checkmark removed from Website Blocking).

[Woomera]

installed over 1.61 without any issues so far but the web-blocking module still has the same DPC latency issue:
http://forums.malwar...l=&fromsearch=1

[exile360]

ourstanley, on 29 June 2012 - 02:49 AM, said:

Yup, did the same as above with the latest update (checkmark removed from Website Blocking).

That's quite normal. This occurs because the website blocking database is being refreshed/updated. It will re-check itself once the refresh completes, usually within a minute or two.

[wildman424]

Installed over previous version, all settings carried over. First scan seemed a little slower than usual. no other issues or problems.

[exile360]

ourstanley, on 29 June 2012 - 03:29 AM, said:

I never noticed that before.

Yep, it's always been there on Vista and Windows 7.

[Knighthood]

Install fine under admin id.

However the beta version only scanned

Objects scanned: 372484
Time elapsed: 28 minute(s), 3 second(s)

verus the previous version that I just scanned before installing the beta version

Objects scanned: 451601
Time elapsed: 36 minute(s), 28 second(s)

One other thing. I normally use a non-admin userid for my daily uses for security reason and doing so does not allow me to have the option to get the latest update of Malwarebytes unless I logoff and logon to Admin id. I think ALL users should be allow to get the latest update before running scans.


Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (PRO) 1.62.0.1100
www.malwarebytes.org

Database version: v2012.06.29.08

Windows 7 Service Pack 1 x64 NTFS
Internet Explorer 9.0.8112.16421
xxxxx :: xxxxxx [limited]

Protection: Enabled

6/29/2012 12:37:18 PM
mbam-log-2012-06-29 (12-37-18).txt

Scan type: Full scan (C:\|D:\|F:\|)
Scan options enabled: Memory | Startup | Registry | File System | Heuristics/Extra | Heuristics/Shuriken | PUP | PUM
Scan options disabled: P2P
Objects scanned: 372484
Time elapsed: 28 minute(s), 3 second(s)

Memory Processes Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Memory Modules Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Registry Keys Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Registry Values Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Registry Data Items Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Folders Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

Files Detected: 0
(No malicious items detected)

(end)

[jadinolf]

Installed with no problems.

Quick scan, 5 minutes 6 seconds, nothing found.

Win XP SP3

Lookin' good.

[Knighthood]

Also I like to know why other users have a faster running time than mine for I have a 128 GB SSD and AMD Phenom II X6 processor PC. Is it because that I have a checked box for "Enable advanced heuristics engine"and they don't ?

Thanks

[AdvancedSetup]

Knighthood, on 29 June 2012 - 03:27 PM, said:

I think ALL users should be allow to get the latest update before running scans.

The Pro version will update without any user being logged on. The free version though requires Admin rights.

You can probably do a runas to launch it with admin rights while under a limited user account to update it

[AdvancedSetup]

Knighthood, on 29 June 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:

Also I like to know why other users have a faster running time than mine for I have a 128 GB SSD and AMD Phenom II X6 processor PC. Is it because that I have a checked box for "Enable advanced heuristics engine"and they don't ?

Thanks

You may need to have your system inspected to see what's going on with it. This topic isn't really for that but if you open a new topic in PC Help then myself or someone else can assist you in checking your system to see what's going on.

Cheers

[Knighthood]

AdvancedSetup, on 29 June 2012 - 04:16 PM, said:

You may need to have your system inspected to see what's going on with it. This topic isn't really for that but if you open a new topic in PC Help then myself or someone else can assist you in checking your system to see what's going on.

Cheers

Never mind for all was doing quick scan and mine was full scan. I just ran a quick scan to compare it and it is fine.

Scan type: Quick scan
Scan options enabled: Memory | Startup | Registry | File System | Heuristics/Extra | Heuristics/Shuriken | PUP | PUM
Scan options disabled: P2P
Objects scanned: 183636
Time elapsed: 1 minute(s), 17 second(s)

[Knighthood]

AdvancedSetup, on 29 June 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:

The Pro version will update without any user being logged on. The free version though requires Admin rights.

You can probably do a runas to launch it with admin rights while under a limited user account to update it

Yes, that does work. Thank you.

[turtledove]

Installed over top, Win 7 64 bit. No issues and running great.

[Popeye]

Smooth download over previous version, no problems, all settings were saved. Windows XP (SP-3).

[nsm0220]

everything works fine as i aware of