Version 0.60
#2
Posted 28 July 2007 - 10:12 PM

Member Since 2004
Calendar of Updates?

#3
Posted 28 July 2007 - 10:45 PM
Version 0.60 Beta (July 28th, 2007)
1. (FIXED) Changed installer images.
2. (FIXED) Problem will 'Full Scan' showing no drives selected prompt.
3. (FIXED) Issue with setting saving with extra space in registry.
4. (ADDED) Initial license code implementation.

Member Since 2004
Calendar of Updates?

#4
Posted 28 July 2007 - 10:55 PM
MBAM v.60 Database 100, Quick and Full scans no problems, no bugs to report. All is well.
#5
Posted 28 July 2007 - 11:01 PM
Install and full scan ran great 30 min and I think 26 sec, the run time made me forget
#6
Posted 28 July 2007 - 11:14 PM
I just tried to run again from desktop icon on XP and I get run-time error '380': Invalid property value.

Member Since 2004
Calendar of Updates?

#7
Posted 29 July 2007 - 02:42 AM
2gb memory
Win Xp Pro MCE sp3
Webroot SecureAnywhere Essentials
Malwarebytes Pro
Superantispyware pro
Sandboxie
#8
Posted 29 July 2007 - 03:12 AM
I have regularly update Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware without any problems until todays update to Version 0.60
Prexv2 threw up this warning "false positive" I would suspect. I was unable to obtain any info from the Details
#9
Posted 29 July 2007 - 07:47 AM
#10
Posted 29 July 2007 - 08:11 AM
I confirm what Whitlam posted: I got a message from Prevx2.0 which put the updater into Jail! I just said a while ago that I was running an installation though!
I didn't got this message while I was upgrading from 0.56 to 0.58.
I tried a second time to be sure it was well MBAM Updater (it was well).
I stopped Prevx2.0 resident the upgraded to MBAM 0.60.
Here are some details by PrevxInfo:
I have a "Disagree with this determination" link.IS-9A99I.TMP
This executable program has a file size of 675,328 bytes, it is most frequently called IS-9A99I.TMP and is most frequently located in the %temp%\is-2d7s0.tmp\ folder.
The file header contains the following information:
Product: Setup/Uninstall
Version: 0.0.0.
This file is considered unsafe. It was first seen on Wednesday, Jul 25 2007. It has been seen frequently by 13 users in this section of the community. The file was first seen in URUGUAY but has been seen in other locations, including FRANCE.
IS-9A99I.TMP has been seen to perform the following behaviors:
- This Process Creates Other Processes
- This Process Deletes Other Processes
- Executes a Process
- Adds of a Registry Key (RUN) to auto start Programs on system start up
IS-9A99I.TMP has been the subject of the following behaviors:
- Executed from Temporary Folders
- Executed a Process
Here's what I sent to Prevx Determinations:
Prevx Determinations
Prevx continually monitors the tens of millions of applications available to install on PCs. We may on occasions make mistakes with the determination of an application and would welcome your help in ensuring we have the most appropriate determination of an application.
If you disagree with the enclosed determination, then please post details of what you think this application is, to allow Prevx staff to review the determination.
Email Address: xxxxx@xxxxxSuggested Determination: Good
Disagree with IS-9A99I.TMP...
I was just running the Updater of Malwarebytes AntiMalware for which I am a beta tester!
I had responded to Prevx that I was installing a program a while ago.
I was told you similarly block the legitimate updater of RogueRemover ( http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=2122 ).
Thanks for taking my message into consideration!
Prevx Determinations
Thank you for your feedback
I then reactivated Prevx shield again: my Prevx icon in Systray is now green (after a brown/orange color)!
#11
Posted 29 July 2007 - 01:15 PM
Securitycadets' Owner
Follow me on: Twitter | Follow Securitycadets' on: Twitter | Become a fan on: Facebook
Click here to get SCars | Check your Computers' Security with DefenceInspector

Disclaimer: The opinions I post are my own and don't reflect the police force I am in.
#12
Posted 29 July 2007 - 06:32 PM
Tests with 0.60 /100
- Problems with Prevx as reported above.
- Quick Scan - 5 min. 20 sec. for 14,256 objects
- Full Scan - 44 min. 24 sec. for 71,608 objects
Still the same problem of False Positive (2 byte-file) ( http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.p...post&p=6648 )
Still the same problem of malware undetected! ( http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.p...post&p=6648 )
#13
Posted 29 July 2007 - 07:31 PM
As for the other it should be up tonight .
EDIT:
I need some files here .
@Marcin , if you have them let me know where they are stored .
#14
Posted 29 July 2007 - 07:31 PM
Real-Time: Avast Pro | Outpost Pro Firewall | Winpatrol Plus | Admuncher | SS Premium
On-Demand: MBAM | Hitman Pro | SAS Pro
#15
Posted 29 July 2007 - 07:50 PM
Uninstall the older version first then uninstall 0.60.hi everyone just updated to 60 on my one machine and everything is ok did a scan close program and then reopen and it seems find to me only thing like before is there is still two entries in add remove the two are anti-malware and anti-malware 60 beta do we need to uninstalled then reinstalled or is this going to be fix with a new version other then that everything ok at my end
Then reinstall 0.60.
That will take care of the problem.

Member Since 2004
Calendar of Updates?

#16
Posted 29 July 2007 - 09:09 PM
Real-Time: Avast Pro | Outpost Pro Firewall | Winpatrol Plus | Admuncher | SS Premium
On-Demand: MBAM | Hitman Pro | SAS Pro
#17
Posted 29 July 2007 - 10:53 PM
After re-installing it, I am stuck at v.54. When I update, I get the message that the latest version was downloaded and will install, but nothing happens. Still stuck with v.54, and dbv 88.
How do I get back the latest version?
#19
Posted 29 July 2007 - 11:02 PM
Real-Time: Avast Pro | Outpost Pro Firewall | Winpatrol Plus | Admuncher | SS Premium
On-Demand: MBAM | Hitman Pro | SAS Pro
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked













