5 replies to this topic

[paula]

Hi

See this:

"A report from NSS Labs shows that Microsoft's Internet Explorer 8 was able to catch 81 percent of attack-code-infected sites, an improvement of 17 percent since March, reports Computerworld."

http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/community...sites/?cs=34972


So, what's the point of implementing the same kind of protection in MBAM if is already in most browsers?





Thanks,
Paula

[srtools1980y]

My statistics:

Before MBAM : 4 infections in July & August
After MBAM : 0 infections till date.(Aug. 12th onwards)

Win XP SP 3 & IE 8.

[swagger]

81% is the point. That's no where near close to 100% and MBAM's IP protection brings you closer to that number. The database of malicious IPs is updated daily to include new threats and remove threats that no longer exist.

[Swandog46]

"It should also be noted that the testing was sponsored by Microsoft's security team."

[srtools1980y]

I don't have faith in IE 8 or Windows Defender OR Windows Malacious Software Removal Tool.
They have let me down many times.

[swagger]

Swandog46, on Sep 16 2009, 11:20 AM, said:

"It should also be noted that the testing was sponsored by Microsoft's security team."

Haha, so should we turn those numbers around, 18% detection?