#1
Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:27 AM
I suppose I'm boasting but after some brilliant help on these forums I now have a clean laptop that boots up in 60 seconds dead. From what I've read that's pretty swift. Can anyone beat my time?
#2
Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:35 AM
60 seconds for a system that is not brand new and has probably many types of programs installed is good. Mine starts up in about 36 seconds from a power off, not a sleep or hibernate mode but it has very little software on it and used for testing mainly so I keep it lean and clean.
Don't have the link but I hear that Microsoft has a custom build of Windows 7 on a laptop, I believe, in a lab that starts from cold off to desktop in 18 seconds.
Don't have the link but I hear that Microsoft has a custom build of Windows 7 on a laptop, I believe, in a lab that starts from cold off to desktop in 18 seconds.
#3
Posted 08 October 2009 - 08:50 AM
Wow that's good! As you say, mine has a typical load of software and 1000's of pics, so I'm happy. I don't have a netbook, but am i right in thinking they boot up pdq?
#4
Posted 08 October 2009 - 09:06 AM
Not really. I bought one for my wife and it's a pig if you ask me. Under powered and slow overall.
#5
Posted 08 October 2009 - 03:46 PM
after some great help from Exile
, about two minutes at most. I haven't actually timed it, though, maybe I should. I will and I'll post back tonight! 
If my AV is updating as its starting up though, it will take longer, which is really annoying sometimes :/ lol
It was like 5 minutes or so before he helped me... ech.
If my AV is updating as its starting up though, it will take longer, which is really annoying sometimes :/ lol
It was like 5 minutes or so before he helped me... ech.
#6
Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:29 PM
Here it is 80 sec. for desktop & 60 sec. for laptop.
In systray I keep only security softs & C partition will always have about 75% freespace.
In systray I keep only security softs & C partition will always have about 75% freespace.
#7
Posted 08 October 2009 - 05:44 PM
By me i think 2, no 4 Minutes, to boot up my System
Startup, KAV, Superantispyware, and others....
MAM
Startup, KAV, Superantispyware, and others....
MAM
Windows XP home, SP3, all updates after SP3, Fire Fox 3.6.3, Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702, 2.4 Ghz slow computer, with 1 GB RAM, two hard drive.
#8
Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:02 PM
from a cold start, 60 sec. max.

No trees were harmed in the posting of this message...however an extraordinarily large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
http://www.tentrexindustries.com/
#9
Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:25 PM
I would say 60-90 seconds but I do probably have alot of things that start up that should stop but i'm too lazy and noobish to
Vista HB 32 bit,WoT,ABP,Sandboxie free,MBAM,Ccleaner,NoScript,AVG 2011 free,Hostsman
#10
Posted 08 October 2009 - 09:53 PM
Roughly 37 seconds for my Windows 7 laptop to boot. And that's with me having to manually select Windows 7 at the boot loader screen. My desktop is probably not far behind. I would say 45-50 secs. I'm interested to see how fast exile's is because he keeps everything disabled at boot, including his network adapters.
Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal, MBAM Pro
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal
#11
Posted 09 October 2009 - 06:15 AM
So it seems like a bit of housework can get you a PC that starts in around a minute or less - compared with my wife's (which takes minutes cos the children are forever downloading smileys etc
). It's amazing what we accept though - if you had to turn your car's ignition key then wait a couple of minutes before moving off, it wouldn't feel like a good car! Good ol' Bill Gates eh?
#12
Posted 09 October 2009 - 08:06 AM
steve jones, on Oct 9 2009, 02:15 AM, said:
So it seems like a bit of housework can get you a PC that starts in around a minute or less - compared with my wife's (which takes minutes cos the children are forever downloading smileys etc
). It's amazing what we accept though - if you had to turn your car's ignition key then wait a couple of minutes before moving off, it wouldn't feel like a good car! Good ol' Bill Gates eh? 
My Windows 7 system boots up much faster than my XP Pro system and I haven't bothered to time it as by the time I go to boot the XP Pro system and come back its ready and waiting.
E5200 2.5GHZ, 4GB RAM, 320GB HD, Win7 Home Premium 64-bit, avast! V6.0 Free, IE9
P4 2.8GHZ, 1.5GB RAM, 40GB HD, XP Pro SP3, 32-bit, avast! V6.0 Pro, Macrium Reflect
with IE8 and Chrome, hpHosts, MVPS HOSTS files, MBAM Full, OpenDNS, SpeedFan, WinPatrol PLUS
P4 2.8GHZ, 1.5GB RAM, 40GB HD, XP Pro SP3, 32-bit, avast! V6.0 Pro, Macrium Reflect
with IE8 and Chrome, hpHosts, MVPS HOSTS files, MBAM Full, OpenDNS, SpeedFan, WinPatrol PLUS
#13
Posted 09 October 2009 - 08:17 AM
Mine takes somewhere between 1-1 1/2 minutes to start up, primarily due to my bios which has a seperate loading screen that takes forever for the IDE/Raid chip on the motherboard to detect the IDE drives I have installed, although my primary drive is a SATA 10k Raptor
.
#14
Posted 09 October 2009 - 08:50 AM
lol YoKenny1! You are right there. In the UK, an inch of snow brings us all to a stop...
#15
Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:22 PM
As long my computer boots up, I'm happy.
"Don't worry about a thing,
'Cause every little thing gonna be all right!"
'Cause every little thing gonna be all right!"
#16
Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:37 PM
Quote
As long my computer boots up, I'm happy.
Vexed but true statement!
#17
Posted 11 October 2009 - 03:26 AM
I thought my computer was fast, until I read this thread! I guess I'm comparing it with the old dunger I used to have that took flippping ages, and our work machines which are out of the ark and aren't any better. Paint dries faster than they boot up.
Mine takes 55 secs from pressing "on" to the login/password page, and then another 15 secs for the desktop to appear after that, and a further 60 secs before all the taskbar icons and the vista side bar have fully loaded.... 2mins & 10 secs in total.
I'm also of the "as long as the thing DOES boot up" mindset.
Mine takes 55 secs from pressing "on" to the login/password page, and then another 15 secs for the desktop to appear after that, and a further 60 secs before all the taskbar icons and the vista side bar have fully loaded.... 2mins & 10 secs in total.
I'm also of the "as long as the thing DOES boot up" mindset.
Vista HP 32bit + SP2.
Avast! 7 Free; MBAM PRO; SAS (on demand); Spywareblaster; CCleaner; Sandboxie Free
Main browser: FF (latest version) with Adblock+; NoScript; Keyscrambler; Better Privacy; WOT; Ghostery
Spare browsers: SRware Iron (latest verson) with Adblock+; ScriptNo; WOT; Ghostery / IE9 with Simple Adblock; WOT; Ghostery
Avast! 7 Free; MBAM PRO; SAS (on demand); Spywareblaster; CCleaner; Sandboxie Free
Main browser: FF (latest version) with Adblock+; NoScript; Keyscrambler; Better Privacy; WOT; Ghostery
Spare browsers: SRware Iron (latest verson) with Adblock+; ScriptNo; WOT; Ghostery / IE9 with Simple Adblock; WOT; Ghostery
#18
Posted 11 October 2009 - 05:22 AM
Well, if you're on Vista be sure not to disable the ReadyBoost service, even if you never use ReadyBoost, because part of its function, aside from allowing flash memory to be used as a swap file for ram (similar to the paging file on your hard drive, but faster), it also optimizes your boot speed over time in much the same way that SuperFetch optimizes ram usage by preloading your most commonly used applications into memory, while still allowing the cached memory to be reallocated should you execute a ram intensive program that needs the memory being cached.
#19
Posted 11 October 2009 - 05:32 AM
Is this reply for me exile? Yep I have vista, but I haven't touched anything called ReadyBoost. This is the first time I've heard the term and I wouldn't know where to find it... is it enabled by default? If it is then I should be all good. Never heard of SuperFetch either.
I do do disk cleans rather obsessively (just the one found in system tools), but I'm not sure if that would have any effect.
I do do disk cleans rather obsessively (just the one found in system tools), but I'm not sure if that would have any effect.
Vista HP 32bit + SP2.
Avast! 7 Free; MBAM PRO; SAS (on demand); Spywareblaster; CCleaner; Sandboxie Free
Main browser: FF (latest version) with Adblock+; NoScript; Keyscrambler; Better Privacy; WOT; Ghostery
Spare browsers: SRware Iron (latest verson) with Adblock+; ScriptNo; WOT; Ghostery / IE9 with Simple Adblock; WOT; Ghostery
Avast! 7 Free; MBAM PRO; SAS (on demand); Spywareblaster; CCleaner; Sandboxie Free
Main browser: FF (latest version) with Adblock+; NoScript; Keyscrambler; Better Privacy; WOT; Ghostery
Spare browsers: SRware Iron (latest verson) with Adblock+; ScriptNo; WOT; Ghostery / IE9 with Simple Adblock; WOT; Ghostery
#20
Posted 11 October 2009 - 05:35 AM
Yes, it's enabled by default
. Many people disable it thinking that fewer services running will always = faster PC performance, but in this case it's certainly not true, I tested it myself on my own system.
Running disk cleanups would do no harm to it whatsoever
.
Running disk cleanups would do no harm to it whatsoever
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sign In
Create Account


Back to top









