5 replies to this topic

[ShyWriter]

Works great for me on WinVista32 with all updates through 4/26/2010; 18:15

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.46 beta
www.malwarebytes.org

Database version: 4040

Windows 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18904

4/26/2010 6:21:33 PM
mbam-log-2010-04-26 (18-21-33).txt

Shy

[Francois_Blais]

No anti-virus?

Please turn-on MBAM's real-time protection and watch its CPU usage.
There are many problems with this with 1.45.

TIA,
François

[ShyWriter]

François Blais, on Apr 27 2010, 07:21 AM, said:

No anti-virus?
François

Vipre 4.0 is my antivirus; and I'm using 1.46beta, not 1.45

Shy

[Francois_Blais]

There's nothing in your signature about the software you use.
(that's quite useful)

I know you use 1.46beta.
The purpose of the beta is to check that some problems in 1.45 are fixed.
I was describing one of them.

Thanks again,
François

[YoKenny1]

François Blais, on Apr 27 2010, 09:15 PM, said:

There's nothing in your signature about the software you use.
(that's quite useful)

I know you use 1.46beta.
The purpose of the beta is to check that some problems in 1.45 are fixed.
I was describing one of them.

Thanks again,
François

I agree with you about ShyWriter's signature but your "Old P3-1000 with 512MB RAM" is probably best using Windows 98SE not XP.

When my old P3 died a horrible death it forced me to buy a new system capable of running Windows 7 64bit.

My old XP Home system at 2.4GHZ P4 with 512MB RAM was quite slow but it performed OK and now is in use by one of my neighbors.

[Francois_Blais]

YoKenny1, on Apr 28 2010, 05:45 AM, said:

I agree with you about ShyWriter's signature but your "Old P3-1000 with 512MB RAM" is probably best using Windows 98SE not XP.

FWIW, MBAM 1.44 real-time was running like a charm here, and it was only a few weeks ago.
There's something wrong going with 1.45.
Downgrading my system to 98SE appears as a ludicrous suggestion to me, with all due respect.

MalwareBytes should *not* force program updates, IMHO.

Regards,
François