TeMerc
Jan 25 2009, 07:40 PM
From a user in support system:
QUOTE
* When running from GUI: "More Tools --> Collect Information" - it creates a file containing:
"
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.33
Database version: 1691
...
"
* When running from CMD: "mbam.exe /debug" - it creates a file containing:
"
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.33
Database version:
...
"
Field of Database version is empty (using the most up to date version).
This issue was reproducible with previous versions I had (for the last ~3 months).
Anyone comment on this?
Hardhead
Jan 25 2009, 10:06 PM
Working fine here on XP Pro Tom.
give me a few minutes and I will check on Vista too.
Hardhead
Jan 25 2009, 10:15 PM
No Problems on 32 or 64bit Vista.
eladelad11
Jan 26 2009, 04:31 PM
QUOTE (Hardhead @ Jan 25 2009, 10:15 PM)

No Problems on 32 or 64bit Vista.
Hi,
I was the one who reported the bug.
I was using XP 32bit.
This issue is reproducible with 2 other computers (with XP 32bit).
Will it be helpful to add the log file for this execution? ("mbam.exe /debug").
Is there is something to do with that when running as administrator?
Thanks for your help,
Elad.
eladelad11
Mar 2 2009, 01:48 PM
Anyone can help me with this?
I'm still having the same issue (also tried it after updating today)...
Thanks..
ginnstudios
Mar 11 2009, 06:02 PM
I too reproduce this problem.
The database version field is blank when i run mbam.exe /debug and export the file.
But if generate the log thru the main UI, it populates the database version.
I am running MalwareBytes version 1.30
ginnstudios
Mar 11 2009, 06:09 PM
QUOTE (ginnstudios @ Mar 11 2009, 11:02 AM)

I too reproduce this problem.
The database version field is blank when i run mbam.exe /debug and export the file.
But if generate the log thru the main UI, it populates the database version.
I am running MalwareBytes version 1.30
It also happens with MalwareBytes version 1.34
Snippet from log:
"Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.34
Database version:
Executable location: C:\Program Files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
Database location: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\Malwarebytes\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\rules.ref
"
eladelad11
Mar 18 2009, 11:33 AM
Well I'm "glad" I'm not the only one having this problem.
Is there any solution for this? or any upcoming fix?
Insomniac
Mar 18 2009, 12:01 PM
Using the latest version here, Vista 32 home premium under a standard user account.
Using run and 'mbam.exe /debug' it asks for the admin password and then asks me where to save the file. It saves it as mbam-info.txt and the beginning shows this:
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.34
Database version:
Executable location: C:\Program Files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
Database location: C:\ProgramData\Malwarebytes\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\rules.ref
Running the collect information tool via MBAM itself results in this:
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.34
Database version: 1861
Executable location: C:\Program Files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
Database location: C:\ProgramData\Malwarebytes\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\rules.ref
But here's the strange part: (Possibly another bug?)
If I leave MBAM to create the info as the defualt name (through either the /debug command or through the GUI), it will create the file with a .txt extension.
However, while making these info files on my desktop I started renaming them so they wouldn't overwrite. I changed the name in the 'save as' box to 'mbam-info 3', and the resulting file was NOT a .txt file. In properties the file type is listed as 'file'. In the 'save as' box, even though I changed the name (there was no extension on the name as I have windows set to hide them) the little 'file type' drop-down was still set at text document, but it doesn't save as one if you modify the name. Strange. If you modify the name at all it saves as a file, not as a .txt.
Also, anyone find it amusing that the debug feature has some bugs???
eladelad11
Apr 6 2009, 01:43 PM
Well, it seems like the "/debug" feature does have more than one unexpected behavior.
Insomniac, did you find any solution for running "mbam.exe /debug" and get the expected results?
I mean, with the Database version?
Thanks.
Insomniac
Apr 7 2009, 06:07 AM
No, but I didn't look too hard for a solution as I've only used the /debug feature once, and that was to test this bug

.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.