Root Admin AdvancedSetup Posted September 12, 2011 Root Admin ID:475443 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Just a quick note, that MBAM 1.51.2, simply a patch release, has been released and it is now live. This release is to address minor issues and does not include any new features nor feature enhancement. Link to post
hayc59 Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475503 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Thanks and installed and running great Whats • Fixed issue with users with { or } in user account names• Internal bug fixes Link to post
nickW Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475592 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Hello,Is this new version online?Cnet linkCheers. Link to post
Root Admin AdvancedSetup Posted September 13, 2011 Author Root Admin ID:475600 Share Posted September 13, 2011 No that link has not been updated yet. It is still downloading the previous version. You can opt to install the latest program version by making sure the settings are set to download program updates and then manually check for updates from within the program. Link to post
throkr Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475603 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Just got this latest version (1.51.2.1300) with the updates; no problem at all.Thanks ! Link to post
Firefox Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475671 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Thanks for the news and update! I updated mine and no issues so far Link to post
sho-dan Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475730 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Outstanding!! Download/update went smooth and all is good on my end. Link to post
siljaline Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475733 Share Posted September 13, 2011 I am now current via the internal update feature, however, it should be noted that many of the update mirror sites are still not current. A suggestion perhaps would be to lock the internal update feature on the freeware build in order to avoid the disappointment of download and installing duplicate software. Link to post
Root Admin AdvancedSetup Posted September 13, 2011 Author Root Admin ID:475791 Share Posted September 13, 2011 The free version using the internal updater should also update to the proper version. We have little control over sites like CNet that host our software as well. Thank you Link to post
GT500 Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475812 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Cool. Update installed. Link to post
mountaintree16 Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475840 Share Posted September 13, 2011 All is well here Link to post
siljaline Posted September 13, 2011 ID:475861 Share Posted September 13, 2011 I am one of those that turns off phone-home features such as the internal update feature. However, I did to enable the download of the current version. CNET now has the correct build showing as this was not the case once the announcement was made. Since MBAM does not host a download server, there should be some control as to who is hosting what and when. Hypothetical scenario, if a new build is announced, and one points to a third party site for download - should the onus be on the user to verify if the correct build is hosted on that site ? Thanks, The free version using the internal updater should also update to the proper version. We have little control over sites like CNet that host our software as well. Thank you Link to post
GT500 Posted September 14, 2011 ID:475923 Share Posted September 14, 2011 .... Hypothetical scenario, if a new build is announced, and one points to a third party site for download - should the onus be on the user to verify if the correct build is hosted on that site ? They sort of rely on the updater to make sure that the version of the program that any particular user has (freshly installed or not) is current. Obviously, if a user doesn't run the update, and they installed an outdated version, then they don't get the latest program version. At the same time, even the latest program version will be limited in its detection capabilities without the latest database, so running the update is always important even if you have the latest program version.A good counter-point would be, if a user installs an old version of the program and doesn't run the update, that their database will be even more outdated than if they had installed the latest version of the program and not run the update.As far as update mirrors, I do know that some companies prefer to wait to announce a new release until after all of the update mirrors have the new version of their program and are ready to host it for download. Link to post
rgabbard Posted September 14, 2011 ID:476155 Share Posted September 14, 2011 So far running well on the Dev Build of Windows 8 Link to post
inzanity Posted September 15, 2011 ID:476168 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Hi,My Avast (Free) just detected c:\windows\system32\drivers\mbamswissarmy.sys as rootkit and the default action for this is delete. We may be having someone have Avast inadvertently delete this file.Edit: Haven't had this detection prior to the update.Thanks. Link to post
ComCorp Posted September 15, 2011 ID:476400 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Is a link to the change log? Or did I miss it? Would like to see what changed before I deploy it to the masses... Link to post
1PW Posted September 15, 2011 ID:476405 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Hello ComCorp: 1. Fixed issue with users with { or } in user account names.2. Internal bugfixes.HTH Link to post
Kendiv Posted September 16, 2011 ID:476590 Share Posted September 16, 2011 what's the major changes in this release? Link to post
Root Admin AdvancedSetup Posted September 16, 2011 Author Root Admin ID:476597 Share Posted September 16, 2011 Please see the following link for a change log of our Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware product.Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware History Link to post
Kendiv Posted September 18, 2011 ID:476954 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Please see the following link for a change log of our Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware product.Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware HistoryThanks, buddy. Link to post
poolmon Posted September 28, 2011 ID:480369 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Does this update fix the problem where the previous update would not open/run on computers that had a non C Drive as its boot/main drive? Link to post
Firefox Posted September 28, 2011 ID:480372 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Does this update fix the problem where the previous update would not open/run on computers that had a non C Drive as its boot/main drive?You could try to download it and install it and give it a try.... Link to post
poolmon Posted September 28, 2011 ID:480375 Share Posted September 28, 2011 I was trying to avoid testing the new version until the fix was confirmed, since the immediately prior version generated a path error upon start up and it took a bit time to figure out what was happening and get back to normal operation. I prefer knowing the problem is resolved before reinstalling it on my primary computer. If it were my backup computer I would experiment but my backup computer has a C main drive and both versions of MBAM work on it. Link to post
Firefox Posted September 28, 2011 ID:480425 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Yes I understand what you mean, but everyone's computer is different, so a fix on your computer may now work on another, that was the only reason I was asking you to try it. In the worst case, you would just uninstall the new version and go back to the version you are using now. Link to post
Mainard Posted September 28, 2011 ID:480440 Share Posted September 28, 2011 I was trying to avoid testing the new version until the fix was confirmed, since the immediately prior version generated a path error upon start up and it took a bit time to figure out what was happening and get back to normal operation. I prefer knowing the problem is resolved before reinstalling it on my primary computer. If it were my backup computer I would experiment but my backup computer has a C main drive and both versions of MBAM work on it.Hello poolmon,We are currently working on a permanent fix for this issue.That being said, we have a work-around and I am Private Messaging you the fix. Please check your private inbox.Thank you. Link to post
Recommended Posts